Comments on: Baby Diaper Rash Controversy In the News

By: Raymondo

Raymondo — Sat, 22 May 2010 21:23:16 +0000

This reminds me of the oil spill situation. Why don’t big companies take responsibility? Why can’t they look at the complaints about the diaper rash problems and not just dismiss by saying that lots of babies get nappy rash. Yeah, that can be true but it doesn’t mean that there may not be problems with the product.

By: Janice

Janice — Tue, 18 May 2010 15:21:32 +0000

I don’t think that the Consumer Product Safety Commission just investigates any claim so that means they must have enough to at least study the reports from people about the diapers causing a rash. Why not bring back the old diaper anyway, since a lot of people seem to want it. My little girl gets eczema on her cheeks so I am trying to feed her foods that are good to see if that will help her out. I’m scared about the summer coming.

By: Kristen

Kristen — Sun, 16 May 2010 16:50:50 +0000

If they are doing an investigation than maybe that means there have been some substantiated evidence about the diaper rash sores as a result from this product. It is true that a lot of baby’s get diaper rashes but it can also be from allergies to products that contact their skin so then this might be a very legitimate class action suit. Let’s keep our children safe.

By: Shelly

Shelly — Sun, 16 May 2010 13:55:37 +0000

I don’t mean to be cynical , but I just don’t think we can trust big companies. They can say that many babies get diaper rash and sores but if there is evidence that it discontinued when people switched to a different type of diaper than that seems pretty important.